News

Where Have All the Christians Gone?

Posted in Naples Stuff, News, Politics, Uncategorized, religion on September 29th, 2009 by admin – 2 Comments

Where Have All the Christians Gone?

The number of people who claim no religious affiliation, meanwhile, has doubled since 1990 to fifteen percent, its highest point in history.

christian_cross_ap_doomsday_604x341

AP

Christianity is plummeting in America, while the number of non-believers is skyrocketing.

A shocking new study of Americans’ religious beliefs shows the beginnings of a major realignment in Americans’ relationship with God. The American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS) reveals that Protestants now represent half of all Americans, down almost 20 percent in the last twenty years. In the coming months, America will become a minority Protestant nation for the first time since the pilgrims.

The number of people who claim no religious affiliation, meanwhile, has doubled since 1990 to fifteen percent, its highest point in history. Non-believers now represent the third-highest group of Americans, after Catholics and Baptists.

Other headlines:

1) The number of Christians has declined 12% since 1990, and is now 76%, the lowest percentage in American history.

2) The growth of non-believers has come largely from men. Twenty percent of men express no religious affiliation; 12% of women.

3) Young people are fleeing faith. Nearly a quarter of Americans in their 20’s profess no organized religion.

4) But these non-believers are not particularly atheist. That number hasn’t budged and stands at less than 1 percent. (Agnostics are similarly less than 1 percent.) Instead, these individuals have a belief in God but no interest in organized religion, or they believe in a personal God but not in a formal faith tradition.

The implications for American society are profound. Americans’ relationship with God, which drove many of the country’s great transformations from the pilgrims to the founding fathers, the Civil War to the civil rights movement, is still intact. Eighty-two percent of Americans believe in God or a higher power.

But at the same time, the study offers yet another wake-up call for religious institutions.

First, catering to older believers is a recipe for failure; younger Americans are tuning out.

Second, Americans are interested in God, but they don’t think existing institutions are helping them draw closer to God.

Finally, Americans’ interest in religion has not always been stable. It dipped following the Revolution and again following Civil War. In both cases it rebounded because religious institutions adapted and found new ways of relating to everyday Americans.

Today, the rise of disaffection is so powerful that different denominations needs to band together to find a shared language of God that can move beyond the fading divisions of the past and begin moving toward a partnership of different-but-equal traditions.

Or risk becoming Europe, where religion is fast becoming an afterthought.

Bruce Feiler is bestselling author of eight books, including “Walking the Bible” and “Abraham,” and the host of the PBS series on “Walking the Bible.” A frequent commentator on National Public Radio, CNN and FOX News. His latest book “America’s Prophet: Moses and the American Story” will be published in October.

For first time, researchers report some AIDS vaccine success

Posted in Health, News, Science on September 24th, 2009 by admin – 3 Comments

hiv-budding-color1

More than a quarter-century after scientists discovered the virus that causes AIDS, researchers have finally shown that an experimental vaccine can block at least some infections, marking the first small but significant step toward eventual control of this lethal pandemic.

The benefits of the vaccine were modest, only a 31% reduction in the number of new infections. But coming on the heels of previous vaccine studies that either showed no benefit at all or actually increased the risk of contracting the disease, the study buoys the hopes of researchers who had nearly given on ever finding an effective way to block the spread of the virus.

The results were released overnight in Bangkok, Thailand, where the research was conducted by a team including Thai researchers, the U.S. Army and the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

“This is a historic day in the 26-year quest to develop an AIDS vaccine,” Dr. Alan Bernstein, executive director of the Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise, who was not involved in the research, said in a statement.

“We now have evidence that it is possible to reduce the risk of HIV infection with a vaccine,” said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, in his own statement. “There is little doubt that this finding will energize and redirect the AIDS vaccine field as all of us begin the hard work to translate this landmark result into true public health benefit.”

The trial, which began in 2003, had been disparaged by many critics as a waste of time and money because each of the two vaccines used in it had been shown in individual trials to produce no benefit. But researchers speculated that using them together, with one vaccine priming the immune system and the second boosting that response, would be more effective, and their optimism about this “prime-boost” combination has been validated.

Experts said that it will be many more years before a vaccine is available for wider use, but the results indicate at last that such a vaccine may, indeed, be possible. “It gives me cautious optimism,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which helped fund the study.

The primer in this combo is Alvac, made by Sanofi Pasteur, which uses a defanged canarypox virus to carry three synthetic HIV genes into the body. The boost comes from Aidsvax, originally made by VaxGen and now owned by the nonprofit group Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases. It contains a genetically engineered version of a protein from the HIV surface.

The study involved more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand who had no unusual exposure to the virus, just the normal everyday risk. Half received four priming doses of Alvac and two boost doses of Aidsvax over a six-month period, and half received placebo shots.

After three years of follow-up, new HIV infections were observed in 74 of the 8,198 people who received the placebo, but in only 51 of the 8,197 given the vaccine, a statistically significant 31% reduction.

To the researchers’ disappointment, however, the vaccine did not reduce levels of HIV activity in those who became infected after being vaccinated.

Full details of the study will be released next month at a conference in Paris.

The vaccine was made using strains of virus that circulate commonly in Thailand, so it is not clear whether it would have any benefit elsewhere in the world. The manufacturers have not said whether they will attempt to license their products in Thailand.

At least 33 million people worldwide are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, which causes AIDS, and 25 million have died, according to the World Health Organization. An estimated 7,500 are infected each day.

Aidsvax had failed in two large trials halted in 2003, showing no benefit to recipients. Another trial by Merck & Co. of a different vaccine was halted in 2007 when researchers found that the vaccine might increase the risk of contracting the virus.

Patrick Swayze dies of cancer aged 57

Posted in Celeb, Entertainment, News on September 15th, 2009 by admin – Be the first to comment

patrick-swayze-liver-cancer

Patrick Swayze was a heartthrob for millions after his roles in Ghost and Dirty Dancing brought him to the silver screen. His good looks and simmering performances endeared him to all, but he unfortunately died on Monday aged just 57.

His publicist informed fans and media alike that he died of pancreatic cancer after an almost two year battle.

Swayze’s physician, Dr George Fisher confirmed in March 2008 that the movie star had the disease. He released a statement Monday after the event.

“Patrick Swayze passed away peacefully today, surrounded by family and friends.”

Swayze will always be remembered for his starring role as snake-hipped Johnny Castle in the 1987 blockbuster Dirty Dancing. The role that confirmed his place as the romantic lead of the nineties.

He was a trained dancer, who could also act, but wasn’t the first choice for the role. His performance went on to earn him award nominations and a place in the hearts, and bedroom walls of millions of girls around the world.

Despite his fame, the 57 year old actor avoided publicity where he could and preferred to live the quiet life on his ranch in California with his wife of 34 years Lisa. This attitude was displayed both at work and at home,

He once said: “It’s the cult movies that gave me a career for the last 30 years. It wouldn’t have been worth it if I had been stuck as the leading man or the dance guy.”

He was born Patrick Wayne Swayze in Houston Texas in 1952. Son of a choreographer and engineer. He was a natural at sports and actively participated in ice skating, acting as well as ballet. He went on to study gymnastics, then moved to the Harkness and Joffrey ballet school in New York in 1972.

His first professional dancing job was with Disney, where he played Prince Charming in Disney on Parade before going on to feature in the Broadway version of Grease.

His first movie role was as Ace Johnson in a roller skating movie called Skatetown USA in 1979. His rise to fame began when he secured a role in The Outsiders with Rob Lowe in 1983. This movie saw the birth of the brat pack, and also starred Tom Cruise, Emilio Estevez and Matt Dillon.

Swayze then hit our TV screens in the excellent North and South which received critical acclaim, and went on to be one of the most successful TV mini-series of all time.

It wasn’t until 1987 that his career was well and truly launched as he arrived on our screens as the dance instructor Johnny Castle. This low budget movie was only envisaged for a short cinema run but became a global phenomenon that took everyone by surprise. He received a Golden Globe nomination and a number 3 single on the US Billboard Chart for the song “She’s Like The Wind” which he sang and featured in the movie.

Swayze will be sadly missed by family, friends and fans alike.

DJ AM’s autopsy doesn’t answer many questions

Posted in News on September 1st, 2009 by admin – Be the first to comment

dj_am

Did DJ AM kill himself? That’s unknown — for now.

The New York City Medical Examiner’s Office disputes reports that suicide has been ruled out in Friday’s death of the celebrity spinner.

An autopsy on Saturday was inconclusive and investigators are relying on toxicology tests to help figure out the cause of death for the 36-year-old DJ, whose real name was Adam Goldstein. They may take several weeks.

Another theory is an accidental overdose. A small bag of crack was found in his apartment, along with a crack pipe and prescription pills.

Sources tell E! News that AM, a recovering addict, had begun taking anti-anxiety meds after surviving last year’s plane crash with rocker Travis Barker.

BYE, BYE TV

Audrina Patridge is moving on from The Hills.

“It feels like I’m graduating,” the actress told UsWeekly.com about quitting the popular MTV show. “I’m taking the next step and growing up and maturing and moving on in my life.”

Guess Patridge thinks she’ll find stardom in movies. Next up: a killfest about a college prank gone awry — Sorority Row — with a bloated looking Carrie Fisher and Hollywood spawn Rumer Willis, out Sept. 11. Its tag line: “Theta Pi must die.”

BAD MEMORY

For such a young guy, Chris Brown looks to be suffering a touch of dementia.

In the singer’s first public interview since his

arrest and plea for assaulting Rihanna, Brown tells Larry King that he has no recollection of what happened Feb. 8 and that he can’t believe what he did.

“When I hear about the police reports, I don’t know what to think,” Brown says during the interview, which will air on CNN Wednesday. “That’s not who I am as a person. It’s like crazy to me.”

That’s interesting, because according to documents unsealed following Brown’s sentencing, he was reportedly in two other domestic violence incidents with Rihanna, but no charges were filed because both instances occurred overseas.

8 Airlines Sign Deal to Use Synthetic Diesel

Posted in News, Politics on August 21st, 2009 by admin – 1 Comment

Published: August 18, 2009

Eight U.S. airlines will use up to 1.5 million gallons a year of synthetic diesel made from plant waste starting in 2012, the fuel’s manufacturer announced today.

Rentech Inc.’s fuel will be used for ground-service transportation at Los Angeles International Airport and be made primarily from urban woody green waste such as yard clippings, the company said.

Using the renewable fuel will be American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, US Airways, Southwest Airlines, Alaska Airlines and UPS Airlines.

Rentech plans to produce the fuel at a new plant in Rialto, Calif., which is slated to open in 2012.

The Air Transport Association of America, the domestic industry trade group that joined Rentech in announcing the deal, called the purchasing agreement the first of its kind and said it could signal an industrywide move toward using lower-carbon fuels.

“This transaction promises to be the first of many such green-fuel purchase agreements by the commercial aviation industry,” said Glenn Tilton, ATA’s chairman.

Likewise, Rentech heralded the agreement as a sign of things to come.

“We expect this agreement to serve as a model for future supply relationships at other airports and for other fuels, including Rentech’s synthetic jet fuel, which was recently approved for commercial airline use,” said D. Hunt Ramsbottom, Rentech’s president and CEO.

Deputy in Tasered mom case is suspended without pay

Posted in News, Politics on August 21st, 2009 by admin – Be the first to comment

by Daniel Saltman / The Post-Standard

Wednesday August 19, 2009, 4:45 PM

An Onondaga County sheriff’s deputy was suspended without pay Wednesday over a traffic stop in which he Tasered a mother in front of her children in January.

After an administrative hearing Wednesday, Deputy Sean Andrews was suspended from his $49,095-a-year job for 30 days, according to Deputy John D’Eredita, a spokesman for Sheriff Kevin Walsh.

Andrews, a deputy for the past four years, was taken off road patrol after he pulled over Audra Harmon and shot her with his stun gun twice in front of her two children on Hopkins Road in Salina. He initially told her he saw her talking on her cell phone while driving, but after she said she could disprove that, he accused her of driving 5 mph over the speed limit, according to Harmon. When she got out of her minivan then did not immediately return at his request, he drew his Taser on her. After she got back in the van, Andrews pulled her out and Tasered her.

Harmon was charged with resisting arrest, disorderly conduct and speeding. All the charges were dropped.

The case was reported last week in The Post-Standard and was broadcast on national television and spread across the county via the Internet. The publicity did not lead to Andrews’ suspension, D’Eredita said. Walsh could not be reached for comment.

What happens next with Andrews will be determined by the civil service process, D’Eredita said. If his suspension goes beyond 30 days, his pay must resume, according to state law. If that happens, Andrews would be placed in the sheriff’s “temporary assignment unit,” where deputies facing pending discipline report to a room but are not allowed to do any work.

Neither Andrews, 37, nor his lawyer could be reached for comment.

Harmon, 38, sued the sheriff’s office last week over the incident. Her lawyer, Terrance Hoffmann, said he hopes the sheriff’s office takes more disciplinary action against Andrews. But if the deputy’s record is free from any other misconduct, he should not be fired over the Tasering, Hoffmann said.

“We would like for him to be intensively retrained not only in the appropriate use of Tasers, but also trained in how to appropriately deal with the public,” Hoffmann said. “We would also like an apology.”

John O’Brien can be reached at jobrien@syracuse.com or 470-2187.

Tennessee cops shoot 59 rounds to kill one man

Posted in News, Politics on August 21st, 2009 by admin – Be the first to comment

Civil rights leaders worried race played a role in death of suicidal neighbor

Daniel Saltman

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. – Alonzo Heyward carried a rifle around his low-rent Chattanooga neighborhood one day last month, ranting about suicide and ignoring the pleas of friends for hours before six city police officers surrounded him on his front porch and decided it had to end.

His father says Heyward told the officers, “I’m not out here to hurt anybody.”

But police, who tried unsuccessfully to disarm Heyward, fired 59 rounds to kill him on July 18. The medical examiner found 43 bullet wounds in his chest, face, arms, hands, legs, buttocks and groin. Police contend Heyward was a danger to others and threatened the six officers.

Story continues below ↓

advertisement | your ad here


Chattanooga police spokeswoman Jerri Weary described the case as “suicide by cop.”

Civil rights leaders concerned
As questions continue to surround the shooting, Heyward’s family and civil rights leaders take issue with the police response. Heyward, a 32-year-old moving company employee, was black. The six officers are white. They were temporarily placed on administrative leave but have since returned to work.

“We have a large concern about the amount of shots fired,” said Valoria Armstrong, president of the Chattanooga branch of the NAACP.

A Chattanooga Times Free Press editorial cartoon asked “IS THIS EXCESSIVE FORCE?” — spelling out the question with letters labeling the wounds in a drawing based on Heyward’s autopsy report.

His father, James Marine, 61, does not believe Heyward really wanted to kill himself or that he was trying to commit “suicide by cop.”

“He just needed somebody to talk to,” Marine said. “I believe he was just depressed at that time.”

A Tennessee Bureau of Investigation inquiry is ongoing. Federal and local authorities are awaiting the TBI report before they do their own examinations of the case. Hamilton County District Attorney Bill Cox said he wants to see the TBI report before deciding whether to pursue a criminal case.

Police: There’s ‘no magic number’
Police spokeswoman Weary said the officers confronted Heyward when they responded to a report of three men wrestling over a gun in the street just after 4 a.m.

Heyward’s father said there was never any wrestling over the .44 Magnum rifle that his son was carrying and sometimes pointing at his chin.

Police said the officers tried but failed to disarm Heyward with a stun gun. Weary said Heyward ignored repeated commands to drop the rifle and officers fired when they felt threatened by the way he moved it.

Police accounts and a patrol car video indicate the shots were fired in three volleys, all within 30 seconds. Each officer used a .45-caliber pistol. Some officers emptied their magazines, reloaded and fired again, while others didn’t fire all their bullets, Weary said.

Some of the gunshots ripped through the unoccupied front room of the house Heyward was renting from his employer, the owner of a local moving company. No one else was injured.

Eugene O’Donnell, a former policeman and prosecutor who is now a professor of police studies at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, said there is “no magic number” when it comes to officers firing at a suspect.

If death is believed to be imminent “there isn’t anybody in the country who can tell the cops 10 shots and no more,” O’Donnell said.

“Unfortunately this is replicated all over the country. When you send the police they bring deadly force with them. They come armed and they come predisposed to use force,” O’Donnell said.

Heyward’s police record
According to court records, Heyward had been charged three times in the past with domestic assault. The first two were dismissed. The third, from a January 2008 incident, remained pending at the time of his death.

He was sentenced in 2005 to 11 months, 29 days in the county workhouse for passing worthless checks, but the sentence was suspended for good behavior and he was given probation.

He also had a few driving-related charges on his record, including a violation of the auto registration law for which he received a 30-day suspended sentence in 1997.

The morning he died, Heyward was distraught after returning from a party where he had been drinking, his father said.

“He didn’t think anybody cared about him,” Marine said.

Heyward also was upset about not seeing his children — a daughter and two sons — according to brother James Heyward.

CONTINUED : Police told Heyward was drunk

BP and Shell warned to halt campaign against US climate change bill

Posted in News, Politics on August 21st, 2009 by admin – Be the first to comment

By Daniel Saltman

Oil firms urged to leave American Petroleum Institute and halt political lobbying by Greenpeace

Protesters in Houston, Texas, on Tuesday

Protesters in Houston, Texas, on Tuesday, venting their feelings against the climate change bill Photograph: AP

BP and Shell are being told to tear up their membership of the American Petroleum Institute (API) in protest at the organisation’s attempts to incite a public backlash against Barack Obama’s energy and climate change bill.

The two oil companies are also being asked to bring a halt to their own political lobbying in Washington in letters sent to their chief executives from Greenpeace and the Platform environmental group.

“BP maintains its membership of the API through paying substantial fees based on the large size of BP’s business. It is our concern that these fees are used by the API to undermine US government action on climate change and that BP’s membership of the API contradicts its position on the issue,” writes John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK, in a letter to Tony Hayward, the BP boss.

The letter also questions the $8m (£4.8m) worth of spending on lobbying in Washington since the start of 2009, saying this runs against the commitment made by BP’s former boss, Lord Browne, in 2002 that BP would from now on “make no political contributions from corporate funds anywhere else in the world”. A similar letter has been sent to Peter Voser, the new boss at Shell.

The demands from Greenpeace follow revelations in the Guardian last Friday that the API was pumping money into a series of “citizen rallies” to put pressure on the Obama administration over its support for a climate change bill sponsored by Congressmen Henry Waxman and Edward Markey which comes before the Senate next month.

The proposed legislation, which has already successfully passed through the House of Representatives, marks a clear move by the US to adopt a greener political and economic agenda and ditch the kind of sceptical views on global warming that were the hallmark of the previous government run by George W Bush, himself a former oilman.

An email sent by Jack Gerard, president of the API, says the lobby group will provide “upfront resources” to pay for a highly experienced events company to organise the public protest meetings, but it says oil companies themselves should encourage their staff to go to some of the 20 rallies being considered.

“In the 11 states with an [oil] industry core, our member company local leadership – including your facility manager’s commitment to provide significant attendance – is essential,” the note says.

Greenpeace and Platform believe these actions are “astroturfing” – a determined attempt to create a false appearance of popular opposition to the Obama plans to control carbon emissions from oil while boosting wind and other cleaner technologies. The environmentalists remind Hayward and Voser that their companies were once members of the API-backed Global Climate Coalition in the US which successfully campaigned against it signing the Kyoto protocol on the grounds that there was not enough proof that global warming was being made worse by man-made carbon dioxide pollution.

After protests, BP and later Shell withdrew from the GCC and started to make tentative investments in renewable energy, notably wind farms in America, which continue today. The two companies are now actively involved in the United States Climate Action Partnership, which is seen by environmentalist campaigners to be playing a very positive role on driving forward the green agenda in a country only recently overtaken by China as the world’s biggest carbon producer.

BP said it was “highly unlikely” it would pull out of the API, which was just one of hundreds of trade bodies to which it was affiliated. But it stressed that it was not involved directly in any of the planned public rallies. “Our views on climate change legislation are fairly well known,” said a BP spokesman at its London headquarters. “We support action to counter emissions although we favour market mechanisms, like trading schemes.”

Shell said tonight that it had told the API that it would not participate in the rallies but indicated it would not be leaving the organisation. “Our focus is on seeking common ground with stakeholders that can aid Congress in enacting a fair and effective cap and trade program. We will continue to express our position within API and other business and trade associations of which we are members,” added a spokesman at its headquarters in The Hague.

Meanwhile ExxonMobil, a stalwart of previous opposition to Kyoto but a company that insists it is not a climate change denier, seems to support the API wholeheartedly. The part of the company’s website devoted to the “ExxonMobil Citizen Action Team” gives pride of place to an official letter from the API opposing the Waxman-Markey legislation.

A note above from Rex Tillerson, chairman and chief executive of the world’s biggest publicly quoted oil company, says: “Our elected officials make decisions that affect all of us. It is critical that we as a company, and more importantly as individuals, are part of the political process. By linking ExxonMobil employees and retirees to their elected officials, we can let our representatives know that the ExxonMobil family is an important force in civic life.”

New Poll Shows Town Hall Protesters Are Having An Impact

Posted in News, Politics on August 13th, 2009 by admin – Be the first to comment
by @ 6:36 am on August 13, 2009.

Perhaps all those concerns about a negative backlash against the town hall protests that would ultimately inure to the benefit of those pushing ObamaCare were overblown, because it looks like the public is siding with the protesters:

WASHINGTON — The raucous protests at congressional town-hall-style meetings have succeeded in fueling opposition to proposed health care bills among some Americans, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds — particularly among the independents who tend to be at the center of political debates.

In a survey of 1,000 adults taken Tuesday, 34% say demonstrations at the hometown sessions have made them more sympathetic to the protesters’ views; 21% say they are less sympathetic.

Independents by 2-to-1, 35%-16%, say they are more sympathetic to the protesters now.

(…)

A 57% majority of those surveyed, including six in 10 independents, say a major factor behind the protests are concerns that average citizens had well before the meetings took place; 48% say efforts by activists to create organized opposition to the health care bills are a major factor.

• There’s some tolerance for loud voices: 51% say individuals making “angry attacks” on a health care bill are an example of “democracy in action” rather than “abuse of democracy.”

• Some actions are seen as going too far. Six in 10 say shouting down supporters of a bill is an abuse of democracy. On that question, unlike most others, there isn’t much of a partisan divide: 69% of Democrats and 58% of Republicans agree.

If these numbers stand up, it would be a significant blow to the Obama Administration and to the fortunes of health care reform in Congress.

Will Michigan Nullify Federal Gun Laws?

Posted in News, Politics on August 13th, 2009 by admin – Be the first to comment

Posted on 12 August 2009

by Daniel Saltman

Introduced in the Michigan House on August 11, 2009, the “Firearms Freedom Act” (HB-5232) seeks “to make certain findings regarding intrastate commerce; to prohibit federal regulation of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition involved purely in intrastate commerce in [the State of Michigan]; to provide for certain exceptions to federal regulation; and to establish certain manufacturing requirements.”

The bill was authored by Rep. Phillip Pavlov and currently has 44 co-sponsors.

While the HB5232’s title focuses on federal gun regulations, it has far more to do with the 10th Amendment’s limit on the power of the federal government.  It specifically states:

The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under amendments IX and X of the constitution of the United States, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.

Some supporters of the legislation say that a successful application of such a state-law would set a strong precedent and open the door for states to take their own positions on a wide range of activities that they see as not being authorized to the Federal Government by the Constitution.

Firearms Freedom Acts have already passed in both Montana and Tennessee, and have been introduced in a number of other states around the country. There’s been no lack of controversy surrounding them, either.  The Tenth Amendment Center recently reported on the ATF’s position that such laws don’t matter:

The Federal Government, by way of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms expressed its own view of the Tenth Amendment this week when it issued an open letter to ‘all Tennessee Federal Firearms Licensees’ in which it denounced the opinion of Beavers and the Tennessee legislature.  ATF assistant director Carson W. Carroll wrote that ‘Federal law supersedes the Act’, and thus the ATF considers it meaningless.

Constitutional historian Kevin R.C. Gutzman sees this as something far removed from the founders’ vision of constitutional government:

“Their view is that the states exist for the administrative convenience of the Federal Government, and so of course any conflict between state and federal policy must be resolved in favor of the latter.”

“This is another way of saying that the Tenth Amendment is not binding on the Federal Government. Of course, that amounts to saying that federal officials have decided to ignore the Constitution when it doesn’t suit them.”

Advocates of these efforts say it doesn’t matter if the federal government disagrees, or even threatens states over funding, as they did recently with Oklahoma.  Gary Marbut, author of the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, and founder of http://www.firearmsfreedomact.com/ took this position in a recent interview with the Tenth Amendment Center:

“We’re not depending on permission from federal judges to be able to effectuate our state-made guns bills.  And, we’re working on other strategies to wrest essential and effective power from the federal government and put it where it belongs.

The principle behind such legislation is nullification, which has a long history in the American tradition. When a state ‘nullifies’ a federal law, it is proclaiming that the law in question is void and inoperative, or ‘non-effective,’ within the boundaries of that state; or, in other words, not a law as far as the state is concerned.

All across the country, activists and state-legislators are pressing for similar legislation, to nullify specific federal laws within their states.

A proposed Constitutional Amendment to effectively ban national health care will go to a vote in Arizona in 2010.  Thirteen states now have some form of medical marijuana laws – in direct contravention to federal laws which state that the plant is illegal in all circumstances.  And, massive state nullification of the 2005 Real ID Act has rendered the law void.

While many advocates concede that a federal court battle has a slim chance of success, they point to the successful nullification of the Real ID Act as a blueprint to resist various federal laws that they see as outside the scope of the Constitution.

Some say that each successful state-level resistance to federal programs will only embolden others to try the same – resulting in an eventual shift of power from the federal government to the States and the People themselves.

Copyright © 2009 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.